The Privé Group in Singapore – History, Challenges, and Industry Insights

Founding and Early History (2007–2010)

Founded in 2007 by former banker Yuan Oeij, The Privé Group began with a single upscale café-bar at Keppel Bay. Oeij’s vision was to create a “lifestyle F&B” destination – a comfortable yet elevated all-day dining concept bridging fine dining and casual cafés. Privé’s flagship offered hearty local and Western fare (from kaya toast to burgers) in an inviting waterfront setting, catering to diners seeking quality food in a relaxed ambience for everyday occasions. This approach filled a gap between formal high-end restaurants and ordinary coffee shops, emphasizing consistency, variety, and a welcoming atmosphere.

Founder’s Background: Yuan Oeij had no formal F&B training; he humorously called his first café venture (a bistro named Brown Sugar) a “free MBA” after it closed in two years. Learning from that experience, he launched Privé at Keppel Bay in late 2007. The name “Privé” (French for “private”) reflected its exclusive locale, but the concept was deliberately unpretentious. As Oeij observed, many Singaporeans wanted an approachable place with quality food and all-day service – somewhere to brunch, have coffee, or dine with friends without the stuffiness of fine dining. Privé aimed to meet this need by offering all-day menus, a stylish-yet-comfortable setting, and flexibility to adapt to food trends (for example, introducing plant-based dishes in later years). This foundational vision set the stage for Privé’s growth as a homegrown F&B brand blending lifestyle and dining.

Expansion and Key Milestones (2011–2018)

Privé Group expanded ambitiously in the 2010s, growing from one outlet into a portfolio of cafés, restaurants, and even nightspots. Major milestones include:

• 2011 – Nightlife Foray: Riding early success, Privé ventured into nightlife with Mink lounge and Royal Room club at Pan Pacific Hotel. These glitzy venues, however, proved “ultra-challenging” and costly, foreshadowing the risks of high-end expansion. Both clubs eventually closed, but they marked Privé’s attempt to diversify beyond cafés.
• 2013 – New Concepts: In October 2013, Privé opened WOLF, an adventurous nose-to-tail bistro on Gemmill Lane serving offal dishes. The unorthodox concept failed to gain traction and WOLF shut down soon after opening, illustrating the difficulties of niche dining ideas in Singapore’s market.
• 2014 – Heritage Location: Privé entered the downtown core with a café-bar at CHIJMES (a historic convent-turned-lifestyle complex). The CHIJMES outlet featured an expanded drinks menu to capture the evening bar crowd, blending Privé’s all-day café format with nightlife elements.
• 2015 – Museum Outposts: In late 2015, Privé Group launched an all-day café at the Asian Civilisations Museum (Privé ACM) and simultaneously opened Empress, a contemporary Chinese restaurant in the museum. This fulfilled Oeij’s personal dream of owning a Chinese restaurant and extended the brand into fine Chinese dining. Empress offered modern Cantonese cuisine in a prime waterfront location, adding a new signature to Privé’s portfolio.
• 2016 – Clarke Quay & Live Music: In January 2016, Privé established an outlet at Clarke Quay, a riverside nightlife district. This outlet featured live music and late-night dining to attract partygoers, reflecting Privé’s strategy of situating outlets in high-footfall, “lifestyle” areas.
• 2017 – New Brands: Expansion continued with Bayswater Kitchen (a seafood-focused restaurant at Keppel Bay) launched in 2017, and neighborhood cafés such as Privé Tiong Bahru in residential districts. These moves demonstrated Privé’s attempt to balance flagship locations with more community-centric outlets.

By 2018, The Privé Group operated about 9 restaurants/cafés and 3 club-lounge venues across Singapore. Its cafés had become popular for “breezy” all-day dining – known for items like brioche kaya toast and the Juicy Lucy burger, plus vegetarian and vegan options catering to evolving tastes. Privé’s brand was highly visible, with outlets in prime malls, scenic spots, and heritage sites, giving it strong recognition among Singaporean diners. The Keppel Bay flagship remained iconic for its marina-side setting, while newer outlets captured diverse market segments (family-friendly brunch crowds, nightlife enthusiasts, tourists, etc.). At its peak, Privé was regarded as a leading homegrown F&B success, and media frequently featured Oeij and his venues as exemplars of Singapore’s dynamic dining scene.

(Signature Brands under Privé Group:) In addition to its namesake Privé cafés, the group’s concepts included Empress (Chinese restaurant), Bayswater Kitchen (seafood grill), and earlier nightlife brands like Mink, Royal Room, Bang Bang and Stereolab (the latter two were other clubs the group ran). This eclectic mix of cafes by day and clubs by night underscored the group’s multi-concept growth strategy.

Challenges and Decline: Competition, Costs, and COVID

Despite its rapid growth, Privé Group faced mounting challenges in the late 2010s and early 2020s that eroded its footing. Key difficulties included:

• Sky-High Rents and Overheads: Operating in Singapore’s prime locations meant extremely high rentals and overhead expenses. Privé’s aggressive expansion into “high-rent, high-risk” sites strained its finances. By late 2010s, rental costs were “sky-high” and brutal manpower costs (rising wages in a tight labor market) squeezed profit margins. Privé had to maintain big volumes to justify expensive leases, a constant pressure on the business.
• Market Saturation & Competition: The casual dining market grew crowded with new cafés and international brands. Consumers had more choices and became price-sensitive. Privé’s outlets, once packed on weekends, saw customers spending less and visiting less frequently, especially as economic growth softened. By 2023, Singapore had nearly 23,600 F&B establishments (up from ~17,200 in 2016), indicating intense competition for diners. An industry insider noted that “deep-pocketed chains… are elbowing out small independents,” making it hard for homegrown mid-sized players like Privé to thrive.
• Operational Missteps: Some of Privé’s own expansion bets proved ill-fated. The upscale nightclubs (Mink, Royal Room) turned into costly ventures that never recouped their investment. The experimental offal restaurant WOLF (2013) failed quickly. These missteps drained resources and illustrated the risk of straying beyond the core café concept. Moreover, managing a diverse portfolio of outlets (cafés, bars, restaurants) added complexity to operations, from staffing to marketing.
• Reputation Damage: In late 2019, Privé’s then-CEO Jean-Luc Kha Vu Han was involved in a scandalous assault – he drunkenly attacked a 13-year-old boy in a lift, a case that went public and to court. The highly publicized trial in 2021 cast a cloud over the company’s image. Vu Han, a French national who had been instrumental in Privé’s growth since 2009, was convicted in 2022 and jailed for the offense. This negative press “stained the brand’s name” at the worst possible time, just as Privé was struggling to bring diners back amid a pandemic recovery.
• COVID-19 Pandemic Impact: The 2020 pandemic dealt a heavy blow to Singapore’s F&B sector, and Privé was no exception. During lockdowns and dining restrictions, revenue plummeted. Even post-reopening, consumer behavior shifted – many people continued working from home (hurting downtown outlets), and cautious spending replaced the brief “revenge dining” surge of 2021. The pandemic also exacerbated the manpower crunch, as foreign worker inflows were curbed and locals were reluctant to take F&B jobs. By 2022–2023, restaurants faced acute staff shortages and had to raise wages significantly to hire or retain workers. Privé’s margins, already thin, were further hit by these higher labor costs.

By late 2023, the cracks were visible: Privé Group quietly shuttered several outlets and was seeking investors or buyers to recapitalize the business. Oeij later revealed that they “did our best to ensure the continuity of our business and [spoke] with interested parties… to explore different options,” but “given the extremely tough climate for the F&B industry, everyone has been taking a very cautious stance,” making a rescue impossible. In short, a perfect storm of high costs, a shrinking customer pool, and operational overreach left Privé in an untenable position by 2024.

Collapse and Shutdown in 2025

After 18 years, The Privé Group’s story came to an abrupt end in 2025. Key events leading to the shutdown:

• Early 2025 – Signs of Distress: The group began closing underperforming outlets. Privé Jewel Changi Airport was shut, and at the 313@Somerset mall, the outlet was repossessed by the landlord in February 2025 due to unpaid rent. Another prominent outlet at Paragon mall was given up and taken over by Blue Bottle Coffee (a U.S. chain) by mid-2025. These closures signaled serious financial strain. By July 2025, Privé was down to only four café outlets (Holland Village, Botanic Gardens, Wheelock Place, and the ACM location) plus Empress restaurant.
• Aug 31, 2025 – Full Closure: On the last day of August, Privé Group ceased all operations and closed its remaining outlets. In a message sent to suppliers and stakeholders, the company announced it would “cease all restaurant operations after the close of business on Aug 31” and would appoint “a professional independent financial advisor” to handle next steps, outstanding matters, and creditor arrangements. The group also posted a public farewell note citing “external challenges and rising costs” that left no viable path to continue. This marked the definitive end of the Privé brand’s presence in Singapore.
• Takeover of ACM Outlets: Immediately following the shutdown, Privé arranged for its two outlets at the Asian Civilisations Museum (the Privé café and Empress) to be taken over by Commonwealth Concepts from Sept 1, 2025. Commonwealth Concepts (a joint venture of Commonwealth Capital and Far East Organization) runs other F&B brands like Fat Cow and PastaMania, and it stepped in to keep the museum café and restaurant running without interruption. Some of Privé’s staff at these outlets were retained to ensure continuity. This soft landing for the ACM locations was an exception; all other Privé outlets went dark.
• Aftermath and Reactions: The shutdown of Privé Group was widely reported as it represented the fall of a high-profile homegrown F&B player. Industry observers noted that Privé’s collapse was “the latest F&B casualty” in an exceptionally tough year. In fact, Singapore’s F&B sector saw over 1,700 eatery closures in the first 8 months of 2025 alone. The Privé Group had actually been up for sale for more than a year prior to the closure, but no buyers emerged in the difficult climate. Its demise underscores how even well-known local brands struggled to survive post-pandemic pressures. Privé’s official website and social media went offline by early September 2025, “marking the end of an era” for the brand.

Privé’s founder Yuan Oeij expressed heartbreak at the outcome, emphasizing that the team had tried everything from scaling down to seeking partners. Ultimately, “extremely tough climate” conditions – from cautious consumer spending to manpower woes – made continuation impossible. The fall of Privé, once buzzing with packed brunch crowds, became a cautionary tale in Singapore’s F&B scene about the dangers of over-expansion and the relentless cost pressures on restaurateurs.

Trends and Challenges in Singapore’s F&B Industry (2020s)

Privé Group’s rise and fall did not happen in isolation – it mirrors broader trends impacting Singapore’s food & beverage (F&B) industry. In recent years, many F&B businesses have faced similar headwinds:

• Surging Rental Costs: Rental rates in Singapore have climbed steeply post-pandemic, squeezing F&B operators. Many restaurant owners cite rent hikes of 20–50% upon lease renewal – increases unseen in decades. Prime locations became even costlier as landlords, facing their own cost inflation (construction, maintenance up by ~30% and 10% respectively), push for higher yields. These rent escalations have been called “unprecedented” by tenant advocacy groups. High rent is often the final straw that forces eateries to close, as margins cannot cover the new lease.
• For instance, the venerable Ka-Soh restaurant (86 years old) decided to shutter after its landlord proposed a 30% rent increase, which would require selling hundreds more bowls of noodles every month just to break even. Simply put, many eateries cannot survive the rental spike without pricing themselves out of reach of customers.
• Manpower Shortage and Rising Labor Cost: The F&B sector is grappling with a chronic labor crunch. Fewer locals are willing to work in restaurants, and foreign worker quotas are tight. This has driven wages sharply higher as eateries compete for a small pool of cooks and service staff. One owner observed that bigger players were “dangling up to double the normal pay” to secure kitchen talent. Small independent restaurants struggle to match such pay, leading to staffing woes or inflated payrolls.
• In 2023, the Restaurant Association of Singapore warned of a “serious manpower crisis” and urged a review of foreign worker policies. However, authorities have so far viewed the issue less as a quota problem and more as oversaturation of eateries (too many businesses chasing too few workers). The result is that labor remains expensive and hard to find, compelling some outlets to shorten operating hours or rely on technology (self-service kiosks, QR ordering) to cut staff needs. In 2023, wages became the second-largest expense for F&B businesses (after cost of ingredients) – a heavy burden for an industry with traditionally thin margins.
• Changing Consumer Behavior: Singaporean consumers have become more budget-conscious and fickle in their dining habits, especially after COVID-19. While dining out resumed after restrictions eased, many patrons now dine out less frequently or spend less per visit. According to one café owner, regulars who used to come 3–4 times a week might now visit only once a month. There is also an abundance of choices – new concepts and trendy pop-ups continually tempt diners to try something different rather than stick with old favorites.
• Moreover, with borders reopened, Singapore’s strong currency means locals travel and spend overseas, diverting discretionary dollars away from local restaurants. “Revenge spending” on dining, which spiked in 2021, faded by 2023 as economic uncertainties (inflation, global events) made consumers more cautious. Another shift is the role of social media – over half of Singaporeans (and nearly 60% of Gen Z) now discover eateries via social media. This means restaurants must continuously market themselves online to stay relevant, adding to their operational strain. Those that fail to keep up with trends or publicity can quickly be forgotten by a highly connected audience.
• Oversupply and Competition: The ease of starting an F&B business in recent years led to too many eateries chasing the same pool of customers. In 2024 alone, 3,790 new food businesses opened in Singapore even as 3,047 closed – the highest closure rate in almost 20 years. Net restaurant count still grew, intensifying competition.
• Deep-pocketed international chains and well-funded local groups expanded aggressively, often willing to sustain losses to build market share. These larger players can better survive rent hikes and manpower costs, which “even the fittest” independent restaurateurs struggle with. As one former restaurateur remarked, “even the fittest can’t survive at the moment” given the confluence of high costs and competition, noting that even Michelin-starred establishments have folded despite their acclaim.
• Indeed, 2023–2025 saw a spate of high-profile closures: fine-dining stars like Alma by Juan Amador and Euphoria (which closed shortly after retaining Michelin stars) and popular chains like Eggslut, Burger & Lobster, Kanada-Ya, and Ramen Santouka all exited Singapore. This bloodbath spared no segment – from hawker stalls and casual cafes to upscale restaurants – underscoring how challenging the market has become. Successful survival now often requires either a unique niche or substantial financial backing (preferably both).

In sum, Singapore’s F&B landscape in the 2020s is marked by skyrocketing rents, manpower challenges, changed consumer spending, and fierce competition – factors that together have created a wave of closures (over 3,000 outlets shut in 2024 alone). The Privé Group’s collapse is one high-profile example, but it is part of a larger shake-out that is reshaping the dining scene. As a result, the industry is increasingly dominated by players who can withstand these pressures – often large corporate-backed chains – while many small and mid-sized local eateries are being forced to bow out.

Why Chinese F&B Chains Are Thriving in Singapore (Hotpot, Bubble Tea & More)

Even as local F&B operators struggle, a notable trend is the continued success of Chinese F&B chains in Singapore – from hotpot restaurants to bubble tea franchises. Brands originating from China (and Taiwan) have rapidly expanded and retained strong followings. Several factors give these Chinese chains a competitive edge in Singapore’s market:

• Cost-Efficient, Scalable Operations: Chinese F&B chains often run with a “tech company” mindset – highly cost-efficient and data-driven in their operations. They leverage massive scale from their home base: for example, a Chinese bubble tea giant like Mixue operates tens of thousands of outlets in China, yielding bulk purchasing power and economies of scale unmatchable by local brands.This scale allows them to offer quality products at lower prices than competitors. Industry observers note that Chinese chains can provide comparable or better value due to their operational efficiency – effectively offering the same cup of tea or hotpot meal for less. For instance, while a specialty coffee or bubble tea from local or Western brands might cost $5–$7, Chinese newcomers price many drinks in the $3–$4 range without compromising much on taste or experience. They achieve this via centralized supply chains, large factories for ingredients, and standardized recipes that cut waste. In short, their cost model (high volume, low margin, optimized process) lets them thrive in a price-sensitive market.
• Strong Consumer Appeal and Loyalty: Many Chinese F&B brands tap into consumer cravings with distinctive offerings and memorable customer experience. Hotpot chain Haidilao is a prime example – it built a cult following in Singapore not just for its soup broths but for its over-the-top hospitality (free manicures, snacks, and even entertainment for waiting customers). This kind of “experiential dining” resonates with experience-seeking Singaporean diners, engendering strong loyalty. Likewise, Chinese bubble tea chains such as HeyTea, Mixue, or Chagee play on novelty flavors and authentic “street” cred, often drawing long queues when they first launch. They also invest in branding and consistency: a chain like Chagee, for instance, keeps its store format and menu almost identical to its Chinese outlets, ensuring customers get the same trendy experience abroad. The result is a base of enthusiastic customers – including both the Chinese diaspora and local youths – who advertise the brands via social media and return frequently. This high customer retention allows Chinese chains to sustain volume even as new competitors emerge.
• Financial Backing and Aggressive Expansion: Unlike many homegrown businesses that are self-funded or SME-scale, Chinese F&B chains often have deep financial resources. They may be backed by venture capital, large parent companies, or public market funding. In recent years, several Chinese tea and restaurant brands have raised significant capital (some through IPOs in Hong Kong and elsewhere) to fuel Southeast Asian expansion. This funding cushion lets them weather initial losses, pay higher rents, and invest heavily in marketing to establish presence. A report noted that Chinese F&B firms opened over 6,100 outlets in Southeast Asia in a recent wave of expansion. In Singapore, Chinese chains are willing to grab prime retail spots that locals vacate, even if it means accepting slim profits initially, because their long-term strategy is market domination. Their “deep pockets” give them staying power: as one analysis described, the winners in the current shake-up include “established Chinese chains with deep pockets,” while the losers are mid-tier local operators without unique niches. In essence, ample funding coupled with a scalable concept allows these companies to outlast competition.
• Adaptability and Localization: Despite their foreign origin, successful Chinese brands in Singapore are quick to adapt to local preferences when needed. Menus are tweaked with local ingredients or milder spice levels if that suits Singaporean tastes. For instance, some hotpot chains introduced local-favorite dishes (like a laksa broth or more seafood options) to broaden appeal. This balance of staying true to a proven concept while localizing strategically helps sustain their popularity beyond the initial hype. Moreover, Chinese chains often work with local franchise partners or hire local managers, blending international best practices with on-the-ground knowledge. This hybrid approach can result in better cultural fit and acceptance by Singapore consumers compared to a one-size-fits-all model.

In summary, Chinese F&B chains thrive in Singapore because they combine scale-driven cost advantages, strong experiential appeal, technological efficiency, and significant financial support. They operate almost like tech companies – focusing on efficiency and user experience – which lets them navigate Singapore’s high-cost environment more adroitly than many traditional F&B operators. 

While local brands grapple with rent and manpower issues, Chinese entrants can subsidize costs and leverage massive supply chains to stay competitive. Their rise is reshaping the market: consumers benefit from new choices and lower prices, but homegrown businesses face an even tougher challenge to match this model. 

It remains to be seen if local F&B players can innovate and match the “cost-efficient, data-driven” approach of the Chinese chains, or if the future of Singapore’s dining will be dominated by these international newcomers. What is clear is that the F&B landscape is in flux, and adaptability, efficiency, and adequate capitalization have become paramount for survival in this vibrant yet volatile market.

📊 SmartLend Approval Stats (Weekly Update)

🚀 Week 11 Highlights

🔓 Launched eleven weeks ago:

💼 SMEs Funded: 2

👤 Individual Funded: 3

💰 Total Disbursed: $130,000

⏱ Fastest Approval: 1 Day

📈 Top Loan Type: Private Credit

🏪 Top Industry: F&B 

This post was adapted from our weekly SmartLend newsletter. If you’d like the latest tips, case studies, and SME financing insights delivered straight to your mailbox—join our newsletter here.